본문 바로가기

Report

All 3,257,835 Page 12/325,784

검색
  • 2025

    Monitoring patient doses on CT Scans in hospitals very important, it must be monitored periodically especially in DRL monitoring of CT Examination. There is still a need for socialization regarding the need for radiation monitoring of high dose radiation in CT Scan used. The DRL was related to efforts to optimize radiation protection must be monitored periodically on CTDI Vol and DLP for lowest possible dose and optimum image quality results. Determination of DRL values from 75% percentile from recording mean CTDI vol and total DLP MSCT examination of head and abdomen non-contrast. The overall results obtained from the Head MSCT examination DRL as follows: DRL on CTDI Vol from Quarters I-IV obtained 63.45 mGy, exceeding the standards IDRL requirement of 60 mGy. Meanwhile, DRL in DLP Total from Quarters I-IV was 1005.05-1096.45 mGy.cm which was lower than IDRL 1275 mGy.cm. Meanwhile, the results of the DRL on theAbdominal MSCT are as follows: Quarter I-IV is 9.35-10.31 mGy below the IDRL that was17 mGy. Meanwhile, local DRL from QuartersI-IV obtained: 401.34 - 428.73 mGy.cm below IDRL which was 885 mGy.cm, its suitable with Decree of the Head of Bapeten Number 1211/K/V/2021.
    • Book : 605()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page : pp.02009-02009
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page : pp.1-1
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :
  • 2025

    Objective: This study aimed to evaluate bone remodeling in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during canine distalization in obese individuals and compare it to that in normal-weight individuals. Additionally, the orthodontic tooth movement rates of obese individuals were measured and compared with those of normalweight individuals. Methods: Thirty-six patients (18 obese and 18 normalweight) aged 12–18 years who were candidates for maxillary first premolar extraction for Angle Class II malocclusion were included in the study. The two groups were formed according to World Health Organization guidelines. A normal-weight group (body mass index [BMI] 16–85%) and an obese group (BMI ≥ 95%). Gingival crevicular fluid samples were collected before, 24 hours after, and on the 7th, 14th, and 21st days after the application of the distalization force. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure leptin, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in GCF samples. In addition to the recorded GCF sampling times, the amount of canine tooth movement was calculated using digital models obtained on the 28th day and 3rd month. Results: Leptin, RANKL, OPG, and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the obese group (P < 0.05). The digital model measurements displayed high rates of repeatability (ICC 0.990). The difference in the amount of tooth movement between groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Although obese and normal-weight individuals showed different biomarker levels during tooth movement, there were no significant differences in the amount of movement.
    • Book : 55(1)
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page : pp.3-14
    • Keyword :
  • 2025


    • Book : ()
    • Pub. Date : 2025
    • Page :
    • Keyword :